Opinion

Genocide Narratives and Divisive Tendencies: Why Leaders Must Shun Blame Games and Denials

2 Mins read

By James Sunday, FCAI. MNIIA.

A problem left undefined remains unsolved. Many people loosely use the word genocide in different scenarios, yet very few offer meaningful solutions. As an analyst, what many refer to as genocide is actually intolerance in its full-blown form.

Fast forward to today’s Nigeria, where mayhem and wanton destruction of lives and property have generated mistrust, fear, and hatred across the land. Today, people are seen as enemies simply because they look, dress, eat, talk, or worship differently.

For many of us who lived through a better Nigeria, we know a different reality. We are witnesses to a long history of tolerance among people in this country, when Christians shared Christmas food with both Christian and Muslim neighbours without discrimination; when intermarriages were common; when we attended the same schools and hospitals.

Today, the pattern has shifted. Schools and hospitals are now established to serve specific religious groups. This is a sign of growing intolerance.

Let us properly define the word genocide. It is the deliberate and systematic killing or persecution of a large number of people from a particular national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, with the intent to destroy that group.

Acts that constitute genocide include:

killing members of a group without justification
causing serious bodily or mental harm
deliberately inflicting conditions meant to bring about physical destruction

Following recent mass abductions of students across Northern Nigeria, federal and state governments have responded by closing boarding schools throughout the region. These panic measures are not only retrogressive, but they also play into the hands of terrorists.

In the 65-year history of Nigeria, never have schools in an entire region been shut down because of a terrorist threat. This narrative suggests an avoidance of confrontation with enemies of the state.

Nigeria is gradually becoming a potential theatre of proxy conflict over highly coveted rare-earth mineral deposits, which Northern Nigeria, from the North West to the North East and North Central, is richly endowed with.

Terrorism has been a national tragedy for 16 years. Boko Haram has operated for 12 years, and the Lakurawa terrorists for 8 years. Concerned citizens, including traditional rulers, elders, clerics, Christian leaders and the media, have been working tirelessly to calm tensions across communities.

Meanwhile, banditry continues to spread like wildfire, extending into the South West and South South. A disturbing pattern is emerging across the regions: a sophisticated strategy by kidnappers, bandits, ISWAP, Boko Haram, and Lakurawa terrorists to destabilise multiple regions and render them ungovernable.

These attacks are intense, vehement, and unimaginably widespread. They are frightening and instilling genuine terror across the country.

James Sunday, FCAI, MNIIA
CEO, Hallvive Media and Communications Limited
Abuja, Nigeria

Related posts
EditorialOpinion

National Reputation Management: A Collective Responsibility

2 Mins read
By James Sunday, FCAI, MNIIA Reputation management is a task that cuts across all spheres of national life, from citizens to the…
NewsOpinion

How Compliance through Technology among Banks can Promote Intra-Africa Trade

4 Mins read
By Anne Mureithi Provision of banking services in Africa continues to undergo profound digital transformation where most transactions are conducted virtually via…
EditorialOpinion

The Nigerian Government Owes a Responsibility to Protect all Nigerians

3 Mins read
By: Babafemi A. Badejo, Ph.D. The Boxing Day hit on Sokoto state in the Northwest of Nigeria by the United States forces…
Subscribe To Our Newsletters 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.